Basic Policy

SUBARU has articulated the vision “Delivering happiness to all” and works on the enhancement of corporate governance as one of the top priorities of management in order to gain the satisfaction and trust of all its stakeholders by achieving sustainable growth and improving its corporate value over the medium to long term.

〈Vision〉
Delivering happiness to all
〈Value Statement〉
“Enjoyment and Peace of Mind”
〈Corporate Statement〉
We aim to be a compelling company with a strong market presence built upon our customer-first principle.

SUBARU clearly separates the function of decision making and the oversight of corporate management from that of the execution of business operations, and aims to realize effective corporate management by expediting decision making. In addition, SUBARU seeks to ensure proper decision making and the oversight of corporate management and the execution of business operations as well as enhance its risk management system and compliance system through the monitoring of its management and operations and advice provided by outside officers. We also implement proper and timely disclosure of information in order to improve the transparency of management. SUBARU has created the Corporate Governance Guidelines with the objective of clarifying the basic concept, framework, and operating policy of its corporate governance.

Management System

SUBARU has chosen a structure with a board of corporate auditors. The Board of Directors (nine members, of which three are outside directors) and the Board of Corporate Auditors (five members, of which three are outside corporate auditors) decide, supervise, and audit the execution of important business.
This structure also enables us to achieve more sound and efficient business operations through increased effectiveness of management monitoring by involving highly independent outside directors and outside corporate auditors. At SUBARU, in order to enhance the practical governance structure based on our present organizational design, we have established two voluntary meetings: the Executive Nomination Meeting (consisting of five directors, of which three are outside directors) and the Executive Compensation Meeting (also consisting of five directors, of which three are outside directors).

As of the resolution of the 91st Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 22, 2022, SUBARU's corporate governance structure and the composition of the Board of Directors, Board of Corporate Auditors, Executive Nomination Meeting, and Executive Compensation Meeting are as follows.

Corporate Governance Structure

Directors/Auditors

(As of June 22, 2022)

  Name Position Female Term Total
Years of
Service
Board of
Directors*
Board of
Corporate
Auditors*
Executive
Nomination
Meeting*
Executive
Compensation
Meeting*
Main Areas of Expertise
Management
(executive
experience)
Technology /
Development
Manufacturing /
Procurement
Sales /
Marketing
Global Financial
affairs and
accounting
Legal affairs,
compliance,
and risk
management
Human
Resource
Development
IT / DX
Directors Tomomi Nakamura Representative Director, President and CEO   1 year 4 years            
Kazuo Hosoya Director, Chairman   3 years              
Katsuyuki Mizuma Director, Executive Vice President, CFO and CRMO   1 year                
Tetsuo Onuki Director, Executive Vice President   4 years                  
Atsushi Osaki Director, Executive Vice President   1 year                  
Fumiaki Hayata Director, Executive Vice President   1 year                  
Yasuyuki Abe Independent Outside Director   3 years              
Natsunosuke Yago Independent Outside Director   3 years          
Miwako Doi Independent Outside Director 2 years                
Corporate Auditors Yoichi Kato Standing Corporate Auditor   4 years 1 year                
Hiromi Tsutsumi Standing Corporate Auditor 2 years                  
Shigeru Nosaka Independent Outside Corporate Auditor   3 years                  
Kyoko Okada Independent Outside Corporate Auditor 3 years                  
Yuri Furusawa (Newly appointed) Independent Outside Corporate Auditor Newly appointed                
*
◎ and ○ indicate attendance of the chairman and other members, respectively.
Note:
The list above does not cover the entire scope of knowledge held by the directors and corporate auditors.

Business Operation System

SUBARU has adopted a vice president system and converted the Aerospace division into an internal company in order to clarify responsibilities and accelerate the execution of business operations. In addition, the Executive Management Board Meeting (a body for preliminary deliberation of company-wide management matters before their presentation to the Board of Directors) and the Executive Meeting (a decision-making body for each business division) deliberate on matters before their discussion at meetings of the Board of Directors in order to identify issues and improve the efficiency of deliberations at meetings of the Board.

Board of Directors

The Board of Directors ensures fairness and transparency by performing the oversight function for overall management and makes the best decisions possible for the Company through appointment, evaluation, and resolution regarding the compensation of its CEO and other management team members, the assessment of material risks faced by the Company and the development of measures to deal with such risks, and decisions on the execution of important business of the Company. The Board takes these actions in the interest of effective corporate governance as well as sustainable growth and improvement of corporate value over the medium to long term. The Board of Directors consists of a maximum of 15 members, from within and outside of the Company, in accordance with the Articles of Incorporation.
It is now composed of nine directors, including three outside directors, which was approved at the 91st Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 22, 2022. The meetings are chaired by the chairman of the Board of Directors.
Meetings of the Board of Directors were held 13 times in FYE March 2022 (in addition to these, there was one written resolution passed that has been deemed equivalent to a Board of Directors' meeting, pursuant to Article 370 of the Companies Act and the Articles of Incorporation).

Number of Board of Directors' Meetings Held and Attendance Rate

(FYE March)

Category 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Number of meetings held 17 16 13 12 13
Attendance rate 99.0% 98.4% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
*
In addition to the number of Board of Directors' meetings shown in the above table, there was one written resolution passed in FYE March 2019, two in FYE March 2020, one in FYE March 2021, and one in FYE March 2022 that have been deemed equivalent to a Board of Directors' meeting, pursuant to Article 370 of the Companies Act and the Articles of Incorporation. Attendance rates for newly appointed directors are calculated based on the number of Board of Directors' meetings held after their appointment.

Executive Nomination Meeting

To ensure the fairness and transparency of decisions on executive appointment, this voluntary committee, whose membership also includes independent outside directors and based on ample deliberation, submits to the Board of Directors proposals regarding policies for the composition of the Board of Directors, the appointment or dismissal of the CEO and other top management members, and the nomination of candidates for directors and corporate auditors. It also determines and makes proposals for appointment, dismissal, and nomination for the same. The Executive Nomination Meeting was held twice in FYE March 2022, and submitted reports mainly on SUBARU's executive structure and appointments, the division of duties of executives, and the appointment of representatives of major subsidiaries.

Executive Compensation Meeting

To ensure objectivity and transparency in decisions on compensation for directors, the Executive Compensation Meeting, as a voluntary committee and on the basis of delegation by the Board of Directors, determines individual compensation amounts per director and other issues after ample deliberation. Where matters concern the executive compensation system in general, such as its revision, the Board of Directors deliberates on proposals approved by the Executive Compensation Meeting and decides on them by resolution.
The Executive Compensation Meeting was held seven times in FYE March 2022, and submitted revised policy drafts for determining director compensation systems and details of compensation for individual directors, while deciding on performance-linked compensation for directors (except for outside directors) and corporate vice presidents based on evaluations and the amount of compensation claims in respect of restricted stock compensation for each individual recipient.

Board of Corporate Auditors

The Board of Corporate Auditors, as an independent organization entrusted by shareholders, is responsible for ensuring the sound and sustainable growth of SUBARU and establishing a quality corporate governance system that can be trusted by society by performing audits of the execution of duties by directors, passing resolutions on the contents of proposal items regarding the appointment and dismissal, or non-reappointment, of accounting auditors that are to be submitted to the General Meeting of Shareholders, and performing business audits, accounting audits, and other matters prescribed by laws and regulations. The body consists of a maximum of five members in accordance with the Articles of Incorporation. It is now composed of five corporate auditors, including three outside corporate auditors, which was approved at the 91st Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 22, 2022. The body is chaired by the standing corporate auditor. In FYE March 2022, 12 meetings of the Board of Corporate Auditors were held.

Effectiveness of the Board of Directors: Evaluation Results

In accordance with Article 23 of the Guidelines, the Board of Directors (“BoD”), on an annual basis, analyzes and evaluates the effectiveness of the Board, considers and implements measures to improve any issues identified, and then discloses an overview of the results in a timely, appropriate manner. In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023, aiming to apply the results of the evaluations toward enhancing the BoD's functions, the BoD confirmed efforts to address issues recognized in previous evaluations, reorganized the evaluation items on the survey and implemented interviews with certain directors, and assessed and analyzed the reasons and underlying factors behind differences in the recognition of issues. The results of this process are reported below.

Methods of evaluation and analysis

(1)
Timing: December 2022–February 2023
(2)
Methods: Self-evaluation survey created by a third-party body; interviews

(a) Survey respondents: Directors (9) and auditors (5) for a total of 14 respondents

(b) Interviewees: Chair of the BoD, Representative Director and President, and outside directors (3) for a total of 5 interviewees

(3)
Process

(a) Third-party body conducts anonymous self-evaluation survey of directors and auditors

(b) Third-party body conducts interviews with the chair of the BoD, Representative Director and President, and outside directors

(c) Third-party body aggregates and analyzes survey responses and interviews

(d) BoD verifies and discusses reports received from third-party body

(4)
Evaluation items on the survey
  • (a) BoD roles and functions
  • (b) BoD composition
  • (c) BoD operation
  • (d) BoD support system
  • (e) BoD culture and communication
  • (f) BoD risk management and internal control
  • (g) Executive Nomination Meeting and Executive Compensation Meeting operation
  • (h) Shareholder dialogue
  • (i) Continued BoD improvements

Respondents evaluated themselves on a four-point scale in response to questions relating to the evaluation items. They were also free to add their own thoughts on the characteristics of the BoD and points that they felt would be necessary in enhancing the effectiveness thereof. Upon completing their responses, they then submitted their surveys directly to the third-party body.

Evaluation results

Based on the third-party body's report detailing its aggregation and analysis, the BoD discussed and confirmed the following points.

(1)
General evaluation

(a) The BoD is making solid, gradual progress on improvements by taking advantage of social gatherings of management personnel*, enhancing discussions on the Executive Nomination Meeting, and taking other steps.

(b) Improvements have been made in efforts aimed at “enhancing the quality of discussion of medium- to long-term management strategy” and “enhancing discussions on the establishment of a system to appropriately address newly identified risks,” two areas for improvement that emerged in last fiscal year's evaluation.

* Events for the exchange of opinions on important topics for corporate management, held by directors and corporate auditors but not requiring resolution

(2)
Characteristics of the Subaru Corporation BoD

(a) A BoD with a focus on the monitoring function
Both inside and outside officers recognize that the roles of the BoD are to examine the execution of business and monitor the status of various initiatives.

(b) A framework conducive to open provision of information to the BoD
Business divisions appropriately provide information to outside officers through measures such as sharing internal information, offering opportunities for visits to factories and other sites, and utilizing social gatherings of management personnel. The company environment where outside officers can obtain access to internal materials and contact inside officers as necessary.

(c) A united commitment to enhancing the value of the Subaru brand
Outside officers share in Subaru employees' consistent commitment to pursuing the “Evolution of the SUBARU Difference.”

(3)
Future points to examine for further enhancing the effectiveness of the BoD

(a) Discussing medium- to long-term management strategy (a continuing point for examination)
The BoD confirmed the need to establish common ground in approaching discussions of medium- to long-term management strategy in the automobile industry, where constant, rapid transformation contributes to a lack of clarity and certainty, so that it can optimally fulfill its supervisory responsibility.

(b) Further bolstering the support system for outside directors
The BoD confirmed the need to work on rolling out information via the BoD Secretariat in order to help outside directors perform their functions more effectively than before.

(c) Further improving the effectiveness of the Executive Nomination Meeting
The BoD confirmed that it has been making solid progress through various efforts, including discussions of succession plans for the CEO position and other posts as well as skills matrices for officers, and will strive to implement continuing initiatives and propel further evolution.

Survey results

The figure above presents this year's results only without any comparison to the previous year's results, as this year's survey used a new, reorganized set of evaluation items.

Evaluation Item
(a) BoD roles and functions Recognition of the roles and functions of the Board of Directors
Delegation of authority to execution
Reporting system
Supervision of corporate management
(b) BoD composition Size of the Board of Directors
Composition of the Board of Directors (ratio of inside to outside directors)
Composition of the Board of Directors (diversity and expertise)
(c) BoD operation Frequency, length, and time allocation of meetings
Relevance of agenda items
Timing of proposals and discussions
Quality and quantity of documents
Timing of document distribution
Prior explanation
Content of explanations and reports
Discussions by the Board of Directors
Leadership by the Chair
(d) BoD support system Environment and systems for the provision of information
Provision of information to outside officers
Training of outside officers
Training of inside officers
(e) BoD culture and communication Diverse values
Stakeholder perspectives
Directors and business divisions
Inside and outside directors
Directors and corporate auditors
(f) BoD risk management and internal control Risk management
Group governance
Internal control and compliance
(g) Executive Nomination Meeting and Executive Compensation Meeting operation
(h) Shareholder dialogue Supervision of proper disclosure of information to shareholders and investors
Sharing the views of shareholders and investors
Enhancing dialogue with shareholders and investors
(i) Continued BoD improvements Status of improvements based on the previous fiscal year's effectiveness evaluation

Approach to the CEO Succession Plan

SUBARU recognizes that decision making regarding top management changes and successor selection may have a critical influence on corporate value. Therefore, in order to ensure a successful succession at the right timing, we invest substantial time and resources to carefully develop and implement succession plans.

In order to hand over the business to the right person, the BoD, as part of its essential duties, develops succession plans that can convince all stakeholder groups. To ensure objectivity and transparency in the process for deciding on the replacement and selection of the CEO, the BoD appropriately supervises the preparation of proposals by the current CEO through discussions at the Executive Nomination Meeting.

To be able to implement succession plans appropriately, the CEO begins to prepare for selection and development of their successor candidates independently upon assuming office. Key processes for this purpose include providing information on candidates to outside directors on an ongoing basis, particularly by enabling the directors to monitor the candidates in person continuously in day-to-day business settings, as a measure to ensure appropriate and timely evaluation and selection down the road.

The BoD and Executive Nomination Meeting meet on a regular basis to review the list of essential qualities and skills required of the CEO, which may include removing and adding items, in consideration of perception of current trends, changes in the business environment surrounding the Company, and the future direction of the Group's business strategies.

To ensure the objectivity of the successor selection process and increase the effectiveness of its supervision by the Board of Directors and Executive Nomination Meeting, it is important to have effective selection criteria in place, particularly for use by outside directors. To this end, SUBARU discloses two sets of criteria: “Abilities required of the SUBARU Group's CEO” and “Five key qualities required of the SUBARU Group's CEO.” These criteria serve as a guide for evaluating candidates in light of quality, competency, experience, track record, specialized expertise, personality, and other factors, which have been discussed and decided on by the Board of Directors and Executive Nomination Meeting.


Abilities required of the SUBARU Group's CEO

The SUBARU Group's CEO must be able to: properly understand the business environment surrounding SUBARU, its corporate culture and philosophy, business growth stages, and medium- to long-term management strategies and challenges; facilitate collaboration appropriately with various stakeholders; and lead all executives and employees to work together to maximize corporate value.

Five key qualities required of the SUBARU Group's CEO

1. Integrity
2. Broad perspective
3. Character
4. Tireless spirit or revolutionary leadership skills
5. Person of action

Executive Officer Training

Category Training Policy / Major Ongoing Programs
Directors
Corporate auditors
PolicySUBARU provides its directors and corporate auditors on an ongoing basis with information and knowledge regarding its business activities that is necessary for them to fulfill their responsibilities to oversee and audit the management.

・Refresher courses focusing on information regarding the Companies Act and other laws and regulations related to corporate governance

・Participation in seminars and programs hosted by government agencies, Japan Federation of Economic Organizations, Japan Association of Corporate Directors, Japan Audit & Supervisory Board Members Association, etc.

Outside directors
Outside corporate auditors
PolicySUBARU provides its outside officers on an ongoing basis with information relating to the Company's corporate statement, corporate culture, business environment, and other matters, mainly through arranging appropriate opportunities, such as operations briefings from business divisions and factory tours, as well as creating an environment for officers to share information and exchange opinions more easily.

・The following programs are provided to outside Board members at the time of appointment and subsequently to keep them updated

- Opportunities for discussions with and briefings from responsible vice presidents about the corporate statement, corporate culture, business environment, and the performance, situation, and issues of each business division/department

- Inspection tours at manufacturing/R&D/distribution sites

- Discussions with directors and corporate auditors on management issues

- Social gathering events with directors and corporate auditors

- Participation in company-wide business events, such as improvement activity debriefing sessions

Vice Presidents PolicySUBARU gives vice presidents similar opportunities as those given to directors and corporate auditors, for the purpose of developing human resources to lead its management in the future.

・Participation in external programs aimed at fostering the mindset required for executive management and motivating self-improvement actions

・Lectures by invited experts in specified topics to share and increase literacy in the related field (legal affairs, compliance, IT, the SDGs, media response, etc.)

・Strategy-building camps for all vice presidents

・Recommendation and support for participation in appropriate external seminars and programs

*
Expenses to be incurred for offering the above training to directors and corporate auditors, including outside officers and vice presidents, are borne by the Company.
Category Programs provided in FYE March 2022
All executives (including outside officers)

・Newly appointed directors and vice presidents participated in three-day external seminar programs
One director participated in a total of five programs on corporate governance
University-held public courses were offered on a voluntary and selective basis

・Classroom lectures by invited experts were held for all executives to discuss management issues (Total of seven sessions held)

・Seminars by invited experts in specified topics, including about the Companies Act, were offered via on-demand streaming (Total of two sessions held)

Outside directors
Outside corporate auditors

・Business-related briefings from, and discussions with, vice presidents and others

・Management roundtable discussions attended by all 13 directors and corporate auditors (two meetings, one held every six months)

・Outside directors and outside corporate auditors participated in in-house presentations and exhibits about future technologies and quality solutions

Directors, Auditors, and Executive Officers

Directors, Corporate Auditors, and Vice Presidents

Corporate Profile: Directors, Corporate Auditors, and Vice Presidents

Outside Directors/Outside Corporate Auditors

Nomination Criteria

  • The outside directors are expected to perform a monitoring function independent from the management team and provide appropriate advice on management on the basis of a wide range of sophisticated knowledge.
  • The outside corporate auditors are expected to perform a management oversight function independent from the management team and undertake their role of auditing from the viewpoint of legality and appropriateness on the basis of broad and advanced knowledge.
  • SUBARU has established criteria for independence of outside officers in addition to the criteria for independence established by the Tokyo Stock Exchange, and appoints outside directors and outside corporate auditors who meet those criteria.
Reasons for Appointing the Outside Officers and Major Activities
  Independent Officer Status* Reasons for Appointing Meeting Attendance (FYE March 2022) Significant Concurrent Positions
(As of June 30, 2022)
Board of Directors Board of Corporate Auditors
Outside Directors Yasuyuki Abe As representative director and senior managing executive officer of Sumitomo Corporation, Mr. Yasuyuki Abe has been involved in management in both a supervisory and executional capacity, possesses extensive experience and knowledge in business management, and has an advanced understanding of the IT field. Mr. Abe has served three years as an independent outside corporate auditor for the Company since June 2016. During his tenure, he has supervised the execution of duties conducted by directors, as well as understood the true nature of the problems facing the Company and offered his frank opinions to senior management in a timely and appropriate manner. In June 2019, Mr. Abe was appointed to the position of independent outside director and has been providing beneficial advice to the Company's management. In light of this, the Company appointed Mr. Abe with the expectation that he will provide sufficient advice and oversight of all aspects of the Company's management from an independent perspective as an outside director of the Company. Attended 13 of 13 meetings - Outside Director, HOYA Corporation
Director, Chairman, WASEDA University Ventures, Inc.
Advisor, ORANGE AND PARTNERS CO., LTD.
Natsunosuke Yago Mr. Natsunosuke Yago served successively as president and representative executive officer and chairman at Ebara Corporation, and has extensive experience and knowledge in business management. Mr. Yago is especially knowledgeable in the areas of internal control and governance. In June 2019, the Company appointed him to the position of independent outside director. Given that he has been providing beneficial advice to the Company's management based on his rich experience and wide range of knowledge, and high level of insight into the Company's social responsibilities, we appointed Mr. Yago with the expectation that he will provide sufficient advice and oversight of all aspects of the Company's management from an independent perspective as an outside director of the Company. Attended 13 of 13 meetings - President, Ebara Hatakeyama Memorial Foundation
Outside Director, J. FRONT RETAILING Co., Ltd.
Miwako Doi As a researcher and supervisor in the field of information technology at Toshiba Corporation, Ms. Miwako Doi has accumulated vast experience and made many achievements in this field over many years. In addition, she has held successive positions, mainly in government committees, owing to her high level of expertise and extensive experience and knowledge. In June 2020, the Company appointed her to the position of independent outside director. Given that she has been providing beneficial advice to the Company's management for the generation of new innovation, we appointed Ms. Doi with the expectation that she will provide sufficient advice and oversight of all aspects of the Company's management from an independent perspective as an outside director of the Company. Attended 13 of 13 meetings - Auditor, National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT) (part-time)
Executive Vice President, Tohoku University (part-time)
Executive Director, Nara Institute of Science and Technology (part-time)
Outside Director, Isetan Mitsukoshi Holdings Ltd.
Outside Director, NGK Spark Plug Co., Ltd.
Outside Corporate Auditors Shigeru Nosaka Mr. Shigeru Nosaka has been involved in management in both a supervisory and executional capacity as a director, executive deputy president, and deputy chairman and CFO at Oracle Corporation Japan and possesses extensive experience and knowledge in business management. In June 2019, Mr. Nosaka was appointed to the position of independent outside corporate auditor and has been providing beneficial advice to the Company's management based on his wide range of insights into finance and accounting in corporate activities. In light of this, the Company appointed Mr. Nosaka with the expectation that he will appropriately perform the duties as an outside corporate auditor of the Company. Attended 13 of 13 meetings Attended 12 of 12 meetings Corporate Auditor, dotD, Inc.
Advisor, AI Dynamics Inc. Japan
Kyoko Okada Ms. Kyoko Okada has accumulated extensive experience and knowledge in areas such as CSR and corporate culture at Shiseido Co., Ltd. and has a career in management auditing as a corporate auditor at Shiseido. In June 2019, Ms. Okada was appointed to the position of independent outside corporate auditor and has been providing beneficial advice to the Company's management based on her wide range of insights into CSR and corporate culture in corporate activities. In light of this, the Company once again appointed Ms. Okada with the expectation that she will appropriately perform the duties as an outside corporate auditor of the Company. Attended 13 of 13 meetings Attended 12 of 12 meetings Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member, Daio Paper Corporation
Outside Director, JACCS Co., Ltd.
Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member, NEC Corporation
Yuri Furusawa Ms. Yuri Furusawa has held key positions in the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, and has been involved in the promotion of work style reform, active participation by women and diversity in the Cabinet Secretariat, as well as in the overseas business development in the private sector, giving her a broad perspective and a high level of insight. Based on this background, we expect that she will appropriately perform her duties as an outside corporate auditor of the Company from an independent standpoint. Therefore, we believe her to be qualified for the position and nominated her as an outside corporate auditor. - - Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member, Kubota Corporation
Note:
In addition to the number of Board of Directors' meetings shown in the table above, there was one written resolution that has been deemed equivalent to a Board of Directors' meeting, pursuant to Article 370 of the Companies Act and the Articles of Incorporation.
On June 17, 2019, Ms. Miwako Doi was appointed to the position of outside director at Isetan Mitsukoshi Holdings Ltd. MICARD Co. LTD., a subsidiary of Isetan Mitsukoshi Holdings, was issued an order for action by the Consumer Affairs Agency on July 8, 2019. The administrative order was issued due to misleading representation of services related to the MICARD+ GOLD card in accordance with Article 5-1 and 5-2 of the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations. An order for payment of a surcharge was issued on March 24, 2020. Ms. Doi had no beforehand knowledge of said facts. After this matter was identified, Ms. Doi has been fulfilling her responsibilities in part by pouring energies into the establishment of measures through deliberation by its Board of Directors to prevent recurrence of such incidents in the Isetan Mitsukoshi Holdings Group, which includes MICARD and its subsidiaries, and to make these facts common knowledge among all employees and to strengthen employee training.
*
Independent officers: Outside directors and outside corporate auditors with no risk of a conflict of interest with general shareholders as stipulated by the stock exchange.

Compensation for Directors

Matters Concerning the Policy for Determining Details of Compensation for Individual Directors

SUBARU deliberated and decided on the proposal of the Policy for Determining Details of Compensation for Individual Directors approved by the Executive Compensation Meeting at the Board of Directors' meeting held on May 17, 2021. The policy is summarized below.

Policy for Determining Details of Compensation for Individual Directors

1. Basic policy

As a basic policy, compensation for directors of the Company is determined in view of the following items:
(1) Compensation is at a level commensurate with the roles and responsibilities of directors and is appropriate, fair, and balanced.
(2) The compensation structure is determined by giving consideration to providing motivation for sustained improvement in corporate performance and corporate value and securing excellent human resources.
Specifically, compensation for directors is composed of basic compensation, short-term performance-linked compensation, and restricted stock compensation (for non-resident officers, phantom stock, instead of restricted stock). For outside directors, the Company pays only basic compensation in view of their roles of fulfilling monitoring and oversight functions of corporate management from an independent position. The total amount of compensation for individual directors and the levels of each compensation item are set for every position depending on difference in responsibility by utilizing the research data compiled by outside specialized agencies.

2. Policy for determining the amount of monetary compensation excluding performance-linked compensation (hereinafter, the “Fixed Monetary Compensation”), performance-linked compensation, and non-monetary compensation (including the policy for determining the timing or conditions for granting such compensation)

(1) Policy for the Fixed Monetary Compensation
Directors receive the Fixed Monetary Compensation monthly as basic compensation. The amount for individual directors is determined based on their positions, taking into consideration elements such as the business environment.

(2) Policy for performance-linked compensation
Directors receive short-term performance-linked compensation by cash at a certain time of the year. The specific amount is determined according to a compensation table by position prepared based on the consolidated ordinary income for the current fiscal year* as a key performance indicator (KPI), adjusted according to the matrix of combined return on equity (ROE) and improved shareholders' equity ratio, which are both performance indicators aligned with the Company's capital policy, and for non-director executive officers, taking into consideration personnel development and the business environment. The Company will review the KPI as needed based on changes in the environment and reports from the Executive Compensation Meeting.

(3) Policy for non-monetary compensation
The Company grants restricted stock compensation to directors for the purpose of providing them an incentive for sustained improvement of the Company's corporate value and further value sharing with the shareholders. Specifically, the Company grants monetary compensation claims to directors in consideration of the Company's business performance, responsibilities of each director, and other factors, and directors make in-kind contributions of such monetary compensation claims to receive shares of the Company's common stock. The maximum number of shares of the Company's common stock to be granted as restricted stock compensation is 100,000 per year (including those issued to executive officers). In addition, the Company and eligible officers shall enter into a restricted stock allotment agreement that includes an overview and provisions that state (1) eligible directors shall not, for a set period of time, transfer, create a security interest on, or otherwise dispose of the shares of the Company's common stock that have been allotted to them, and (2) the Company may acquire the said shares of its common stock without compensation if certain events occur.
For non-resident officers, the Company grants, instead of issuing restricted stock compensation, phantom stock equivalent to such units, and the stock shall also be treated in accordance with the restricted stock allotment agreement.

3. Policy for determining the proportion of the Fixed Monetary Compensation, performance-linked compensation, and non-monetary compensation to the total amount of compensation, etc., for individual directors

The Company shall appropriately determine the proportion of compensation by type of directors excluding outside directors in reference to the compensation levels and compensation mix of companies of a similar scale to the Company or industry peers obtained through an external research company, and in consideration of factors such as the Company's overall salary level and social situations. The Company shall also prepare compensation tables for short-term performance-linked compensation and restricted stock compensation by officer position. With regard to revisions of the compensation table, proposals approved by the Executive Compensation Meeting are deliberated and decided on by the Board of Directors.

4. Matters concerning the determination of details of compensation, etc., for individual directors

The Executive Compensation Meeting, by a resolution of and upon delegation by the Board of Directors, determines specific amounts of compensation, etc., of individual directors, following sufficient deliberation by its members including outside directors.
Its authorities include the determination of specific amounts of basic compensation, short-term performance-linked compensation, and restricted stock compensation as well as their payment schedule (including phantom stock). With regard to revisions of the compensation system and other matters pertaining to compensation overall, proposals approved by the Executive Compensation Meeting are deliberated and decided on by the Board of Directors. In addition, the total amount of compensation for individual directors and the levels of each compensation item are set for every position depending on difference in responsibility by utilizing the research data compiled by outside specialized agencies.
To ensure transparency and effectiveness of the executive compensation determination process, the Executive Compensation Meeting shall, by a resolution of the Board of Directors, be structured so that the majority of its members are outside directors, and its chairman shall be appointed.

*
As the Group started to voluntarily apply the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), this is a figure converted to consolidated ordinary income under the Japanese generally accepted accounting principles (JGAAP).

Matters concerning the resolutions of the General Meetings of Shareholders on compensation, etc., for directors and corporate auditors

By a resolution passed at the 85th Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders, held in June 2016, the maximum total amount of annual compensation, etc., for directors is 1.2 billion yen (including a maximum 200 million yen for outside directors). The maximum total amount of monetary compensation is 200 million yen per year, within the abovementioned limitation, by a resolution passed at the 86th Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders, held in June 2017.
By a resolution passed at the 75th Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders, held in June 2006, the maximum total amount of annual compensation, etc., for corporate auditors is 100 million yen.

Matters concerning the delegation relating to the details of compensation, etc., for individual directors

SUBARU has voluntarily set up the Executive Compensation Meeting in order to enhance the effective governance structure based on the existing organizational design. By the delegation resolution of the Board of Directors, the Executive Compensation Meeting determines specific compensation amounts, etc., of individual directors, following sufficient deliberation by its members including outside directors.
Its authorities include the determination of specific amounts of basic compensation, short-term performance-linked compensation, and restricted stock compensation as well as their payment schedule. For restricted stock compensation, the number of shares allotted to individual directors is determined by the resolution of the Board of Directors based on decisions of the Executive Compensation Meeting. With regard to revisions of the compensation system and other matters pertaining to compensation overall, proposals approved by the Executive Compensation Meeting are deliberated and decided on by the Board of Directors.
The Executive Compensation Meeting in FYE March 2022 was comprised of two representative directors and three outside directors. Its chairman was Mr. Kazuo Hosoya. To ensure transparency and effectiveness of the executive compensation determination process, the Executive Compensation Meeting shall, by a resolution of the Board of Directors, be structured so that the majority of its members are outside directors. Executive Compensation Meetings were held seven times in FYE March 2022. The body debated the compensation structure and established a policy for determining details of compensation, etc., for individual directors. It also decided on matters such as performance-linked compensation levels for directors (except for outside directors) and executive officers based on performance evaluation, and the amount of monetary compensation claims for individuals regarding restricted stock compensation.

Matters concerning performance-linked compensation, etc.

In the mid-term management vision “STEP” progress briefing made on May 11, 2021, SUBARU announced it aims to achieve a ratio of shareholders' equity to total assets of 50% and to maintain a minimum ROE of 10%. In accordance with these goals, the Executive Compensation Meeting, upon authorization by the Board of Directors, decided short-term performance-linked compensation levels for directors, using the consolidated ordinary income* for FYE March 2022 as the basis, making adjustment using the matrix of ROE and degrees of improvement in shareholders' equity ratio. Short-term performance-linked compensation is not given to outside directors in view of their roles of fulfilling monitoring and oversight functions of corporate management from an independent position.

*
Since the SUBARU Group started to voluntarily apply the IFRS to the accounts from FYE March 2020, this figure was converted to consolidated ordinary income under the JGAAP.

Performance indicators used to calculate the amount of performance-linked compensation, etc., for the fiscal period under review are as follows.


Performance Indicators Results
Consolidated ordinary income 111.5 billion yen
ROE 3.8%
Equity ratio 53.4% (up 1.3 percentage points from the previous period)

Details of non-monetary compensation

SUBARU grants restricted stock compensation to directors for the purpose of providing them with an incentive for sustained improvement of the Company's corporate value and promoting further value sharing with the shareholders, and pays monetary compensation for the acquisition of these. Directors shall wholly contribute the monetary compensation claim paid as above in the form of properties contributed in kind, and shall, in return, receive shares of SUBARU's common stock through issuance or disposal. In addition, for the issuance or disposal of shares of SUBARU's common stock, SUBARU and eligible directors shall enter into a restricted stock allotment agreement that includes provisions such as the one to restrict the transfer of the shares for three years after the date of allotment.
Restricted stock compensation is not given to outside directors in view of their roles of fulfilling monitoring and oversight functions of corporate management from an independent position.

Compensation System for Directors (excluding outside directors)


Total Compensation for Directors and Corporate Auditors for FYE March 2022

Classification Number Total Compensation (Millions of yen)
Basic Compensation
(Paid in fixed monthly installments)
Short-term
Performance-linked Compensation
Restricted Stock Compensation
Directors
(excluding outside directors)
9 294 51 52 397
Corporate auditors
(excluding outside corporate auditors)
3 56 - - 56
Outside directors and outside corporate auditors 5 59 - - 59
Total 17 409 51 52 512

*1
Figures in the above table include three internal directors and an internal corporate auditor who resigned before the last day of the fiscal year under review. At the end of the year, there were nine directors, including three outside directors, and four corporate auditors, including two outside corporate auditors.
*2
The restricted stock compensation in the above table includes the amount of phantom stock expense recorded for grants to non-residents.

Revision of Executive Compensation in FYE March 2023

With resolution of the 91st Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 22, 2022, SUBARU has revised the compensation system for its directors and vice presidents (excluding outside directors, hereinafter referred to as “directors, etc.”), effective from FYE March 2023 as follows. This revision was carried out in order to provide incentives to directors, etc., for sustained improvement of SUBARU's corporate value over the medium to long term and to promote further value sharing with shareholders.


a. Purpose of revising the executive compensation system

The Company is revising the compensation structure by enhancing the link between performance and compensation and raising the ratio of stock compensation, as well as adding a variable compensation type (PSU*) that is linked to the degree of achievement of performance targets, to the number of shares granted for a portion of the stock compensation plan. This aims to accelerate the achievement of the priority initiatives listed in the mid-term management vision “STEP” and further stimulate motivation and morale of directors, etc., for contributing to the improvement of the SUBARU Group's performance and corporate value over the medium to long term.

*
Performance share unit

b. Overview of revisions to the executive compensation system

(I) Composition of compensation
The ratio of compensation for the Representative Director, President and CEO will be set as 45% for basic compensation, 30% for annual performance-linked compensation, and 25% for restricted stock compensation (15% for variable compensation type (PSU) + 10% for fixed compensation type (RS*)) upon achievement of the KPIs set forth in "STEP."
As before, outside directors will only receive basic compensation.

*
Restricted stock

Compensation System for Directors (Representative Director, President and CEO) after revisions


(II) Annual performance-linked bonuses (Short-term incentive)
We have set a compensation table more closely linking compensation to annual performance the higher the rank, based on the KPI of consolidated profit before tax for the fiscal year under review. Based on this table, cash compensation is paid at a certain time of each year. For executive vice presidents, senior vice presidents, and vice presidents, specific amounts will be determined after taking into consideration performance and level of contribution to human resource development. Such compensation will not be paid to outside directors.

(III) Restricted stock compensation (Medium- and long-term incentive)
As of FYE March 2018, SUBARU has introduced fixed compensation type restricted stock (RS) compensation to directors, etc., for the purpose of providing them an incentive for sustained improvement of the Company's corporate value over the medium to long term and further value sharing with the shareholders.
In order to encourage the achievement of the goals in the SUBARU Group's mid-term management vision, we have added variable compensation type (PSU) restricted stock to the compensation structure to increase the weight of stock compensation. In addition, the KPIs for the variable compensation type (PSU) will be reviewed in conjunction with updates to the mid-term management plans and management indicators. For this revision, consolidated ROE will be used for quantitative (financial) evaluation and employee engagement (employee satisfaction evaluation) will be used for qualitative (non-financial) evaluation, with the goal of achieving the priority initiatives in STEP. Such compensation will not be paid to outside directors.

Policy for Determining Details of Compensation for Individual Directors

1. Basic policy

As a basic policy, compensation for directors of the Company is determined in view of the following items:
(1) Compensation is at a level commensurate with the roles and responsibilities of directors and is appropriate, fair, and balanced.
(2) The compensation structure is determined by giving consideration to providing motivation for sustained improvement in corporate performance and corporate value and securing excellent human resources.
Specifically, for directors (excluding outside directors), compensation is composed of basic compensation, annual performance-linked bonus, and restricted stock compensation (for non-residents, phantom stock instead of restricted stock). For outside directors, the Company pays only basic compensation in view of their roles of fulfilling monitoring and oversight functions of corporate management from an independent position. The total amount of compensation for individual directors and the levels of each compensation item are set for every position depending on difference in responsibility by utilizing the research data compiled by outside specialized agencies.

2. Policy for determining the amount of monetary compensation excluding performance-linked compensation (hereinafter, the “Fixed Monetary Compensation”), performance-linked compensation, and non-monetary compensation (including the policy for determining the timing or conditions for granting such compensation)

(1) Policy for the Fixed Monetary Compensation
Directors receive the Fixed Monetary Compensation monthly as basic compensation. The amount for individual directors is determined based on their positions, taking into consideration elements such as the business environment.

(2) Policy for performance-linked compensation
For annual performance-linked bonus for directors (excluding outside directors), we have set a compensation table based on rank and the KPI of consolidated profit before tax for the fiscal year under review. Based on this table, cash compensation is paid at a certain time of each year.
In addition, in order to encourage the achievement of goals in the Group's medium- to long-term strategy, a portion of restricted stock compensation (described in (3) below) to be granted as non-monetary compensation will be PSUs, where the number of shares granted is linked to the degree to performance target achievement. In addition to consolidated ROE, which is the financial indicator emphasized in our medium-term strategy, we will adopt employee engagement as a non-financial KPI for these PSUs.
The Company will review the KPIs for annual performance-linked bonus and PSUs as needed based on changes in the environment and reports from the Executive Compensation Meeting.

(3) Policy for non-monetary compensation
The Company grants restricted stock compensation to directors (excluding outside directors) for the purpose of providing them an incentive for sustained improvement of the Company's corporate value and further value sharing with the shareholders. For restricted stock compensation, a portion shall be provided as the fixed compensation type, with the rest as the variable compensation type. Both of these shall be prohibited from being transferred during the recipient's term of office, and this restriction on transfer shall be lifted upon their retirement.
For fixed compensation type restricted stock (RS) compensation, shares of the Company's common stock are granted at a certain time each year at an amount equivalent to a base amount determined in consideration of the Company's business performance, responsibilities of each director, and other factors.
For variable compensation type restricted stock compensation (PSUs), units (one unit = one share) are granted at a certain time each year at an amount equivalent to a base amount determined in consideration of the Company's business performance, responsibilities of each director, and other factors. After an evaluation period, shares of the Company's common stock are granted at an amount equivalent to the number of units multiplied by a payout ratio (50% to 100%) determined in accordance with achievement levels for performance indicator targets.
The maximum number of shares of the Company's common stock to be granted as restricted stock compensation to directors, for RS and PSUs combined, is 150,000 per year. In addition, the Company and its directors shall enter into a restricted stock allotment agreement that includes an overview and provisions that state (1) Company executives shall not, while they serve in their positions as executives and for a set period of time, transfer, create a security interest on, or otherwise dispose of the shares of the Company's common stock that have been allotted to them, and (2) the Company may acquire the said shares of its common stock without compensation if certain events occur. If a director is a non-resident of Japan at the time shares are granted, the Company shall grant phantom stock in place of and equivalent to the restricted stock compensation that would have been granted, and the stock shall also be treated in accordance with the restricted stock allotment agreement.

3. Policy for determining the proportion of the Fixed Monetary Compensation, performance-linked compensation, and non-monetary compensation to the total amount of compensation, etc., for individual directors

The Company has set the following as a general guideline for proportions of compensation by type for directors (excluding outside directors) in reference to the compensation levels and compensation mix of companies of a similar scale to the Company or industry peers obtained through an external research company, and in consideration of factors such as the Company's overall salary level and social situations (performance-based compensation is a proportion of the base amount).



Breakdown Rate
Basic compensation Annual performance-linked compensation Restricted stock compensation President Directors other than the President
RS PSU
Fixed monetary compensation


45% 50%
Performance-linked compensation

45% 40%
Non-monetary compensation

25% 20%

The Company shall appropriately review the compensation level and compensation mix in consideration of the Company's business environment, as well as the situation of companies of a similar scale to the Company or industry peers, and other circumstances based on reports from the Executive Compensation Meeting.

4. Matters concerning the determination of details of compensation, etc., for individual directors

The Executive Compensation Meeting, by a resolution of and upon delegation by the Board of Directors, determines specific amounts of compensation, etc., of individual directors, following sufficient deliberation by its members including outside directors. Its authorities include the determination of specific amounts of basic compensation, annual performance-linked bonus, and restricted stock compensation as well as their payment schedule. For restricted stock compensation, the number of shares allotted to individual directors is determined by the resolution of the Board of Directors based on decisions of the Executive Compensation Meeting. With regard to revisions of the compensation system and other matters pertaining to compensation overall, proposals approved by the Executive Compensation Meeting are deliberated and decided on by the Board of Directors.
To ensure transparency and effectiveness of the executive compensation determination process, the Executive Compensation Meeting shall, by a resolution of the Board of Directors, be structured so that the majority of its members are outside directors, and its chairman shall be appointed by a resolution of the Board of Directors.

Preventing Conflicts of Interest

The approval of the Board of Directors is obtained in advance where a transaction poses the risk of a conflict of interest. A report on the positions that each director has held concurrently over the past financial year is provided once a year at the April meeting of the Board of Directors (a report to confirm that there have been no improper transactions or positions held).

Auditing

Auditing by Corporate Auditors

SUBARU has formulated internal rules to ensure the effectiveness of corporate auditors' audits (e.g., Standards for Corporate Auditor's Audit) and developed a whistleblowing system. In this way, the Company established a framework where the corporate auditors can gather information from directors and employees as needed in case of matters that may cause significant damages to the Company, significant violation of laws/the Articles of Incorporation, or other significant compliance matters. In addition, the framework ensures smooth performance of corporate auditors' duties by assigning employees independent from directors to support duties of corporate auditors and making them known to all employees.
In FYE March 2022, audits focused on (1) the status of risk management promotion, (2) the Group governance system, and (3) the progress of the mid-term management vision “STEP.” These confirmed the soundness of efforts to resolve overall management issues including governance at each department and Group company.

Main Initiatives

1) Confirming management monitoring and execution
In accordance with audit plans by corporate auditors, each corporate auditor attends important meetings, including those of the Board of Directors, Executive Management Board Meeting, and Risk Management and Compliance Committee. When in attendance, they monitor management decision-making processes, seek explanations as necessary, and actively express their opinions. Through exchanges of opinions with directors, vice presidents, and others, as well as site visits to major business establishments and Group companies, corporate auditors also confirmed the status of business execution including the maintenance and operation of internal controls, with a focus on priority audit items.
We also ensure the effectiveness of audits by utilizing remote methods, such as online meetings, as necessary and appropriate.

2) Meetings with departments related to internal controls
The Legal Department and the Risk Management and Compliance Office report monthly on compliance concerns including the operation of the whistleblowing system, and human resource departments report regularly on the status of issues such as disciplinary cases and industrial accidents.
In addition, the Company receives reports from the departments in charge of managing subsidiaries on the status of governance and internal controls for subsidiaries as appropriate.

3) Cooperation in the three-party audit system
The Company holds monthly audit report meetings with the Internal Audit Department, receives reports on all internal audit results, and exchanges information and opinions on internal control issues.
We also receive quarterly reports from the accounting auditors on the status of accounting audits and exchange opinions with them as necessary on major matters for consideration in audits and other subjects, thereby ensuring close mutual cooperation in the three-party audit system.
In addition, we hold meetings to exchange opinions and share information with corporate auditors of Group companies as appropriate, and we also seek to collaborate with these corporate auditors by requesting their attendance at site visits of their respective Group companies.

Based on the findings confirmed through the above audit activities, we capture a range of opportunities to engage with the business execution side, including exchanges of opinions with all corporate auditors, the chair of the Board of Directors, and the representative directors, and at Group company presidents' meetings. Through these activities, we share information and provide necessary advice and recommendations for the resolution of important management issues, including the strengthening of Group governance.

Internal Auditing

SUBARU has established the Audit Department (15 members) that reports directly to the President as an internal auditing organization. This organization evaluates the state of the development and operation of internal controls with regard to business execution at SUBARU and its Group companies in Japan and overseas from an independent and objective standpoint, providing advice and proposals for improvement. The Audit Department systematically conducts audits of business execution in accordance with an annual business audit plan prepared at the beginning of each fiscal year, taking into consideration the risks and internal control status of the entire Group. Audit reports are distributed to all directors, corporate auditors, and relevant departments at the same time as reports are directly made to the President. In parallel with this, reports are also made at semi-annual meetings of the Board of Directors and quarterly at joint meetings consisting of all vice presidents.
SUBARU's Audit Department and corporate auditors work together to strengthen audit functions, as described in “Cooperation in the three-party audit system” above. In addition, we strive to strengthen audit functions by sharing information with the accounting auditors on audit plans and audit results on a quarterly basis. In addition, the internal Audit Department periodically undergoes an evaluation by external experts to confirm that the audit operations are being performed appropriately.

Internal Control

Management System

With the aim of increasing the effectiveness of internal controls and risk management, the Internal Audit Department was made independent of the Risk Management Group (overseen by the Chief Risk Management Officer (CRMO)) to ensure a higher level of independence of internal audit departments in the organization and to enhance the effectiveness of internal controls.

Internal Control System

In accordance with the Companies Act and the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Companies Act, SUBARU's Board of Directors has adopted a basic policy on putting in place systems that ensure that the performance of duties by directors is in conformity with laws and regulations and with the Articles of Incorporation, and other systems prescribed in the ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as being necessary to ensure the appropriate operations of the Company and the corporate group consisting of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Board of Directors maintains and operates this basic policy, reviewing it as needed.

Internal Control System Related to Financial Reporting

Regarding internal control reporting systems pursuant to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, the evaluation of the internal control system related to financial reporting is dated the final day of the consolidated accounting period and is conducted in accordance with generally accepted assessment standards for internal control over financial reporting.
The President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) evaluated the status of the development of the internal control system related to financial reporting as of March 31, 2022 and affirmed that it has been established properly and functions effectively, and issued an internal control report audited by the accounting auditors to that effect.

SUBARU Group Governance

The SUBARU Group has established a Group-wide governance stance that contributes to the sound business operations of the Group's global companies in order to maintain and enhance brand value and enhance the overall strength of the Group in response to social demands, including for sound corporate governance.

Group Companies (Affiliates in Japan, Excluding SUBARU Dealerships)

As part of efforts to strengthen the governance of the SUBARU Group, with reorganizations in April 2021 we updated to a new group collaboration system. In this system, the Business Administration Department of SUBARU manages Group companies and their businesses to promote more unified activities. In addition, we are working to create a system in which SUBARU's corporate departments provide cross-organizational support for these activities, striving to enhance the effectiveness of Group governance.

1. Initiatives in the new group collaboration system

In FYE March 2022, as the start of our new collaboration system, we redefined the roles and responsibilities of the relevant SUBARU departments involved in Group governance, and reflected and clarified these in the Subsidiary Management Rules. In addition to laying the foundation for governance activities between Group companies and SUBARU, each relevant department is promoting governance activities while deepening cooperation.

■ Roles and responsibilities of the Business Administration Department

Clarification of the roles and missions of the Group companies under their authority, overall management of business operations, support for the establishment of management foundations, etc.

■ Roles and responsibilities of the departments responsible for corporate functions

Presenting policies and guidelines to Group companies, support and collaboration in the area of corporate functions, etc.

■ Roles and responsibilities of the Corporate Planning Department

Establishment of the Group governance structure, handling of cross-Group issues, operation of the performance evaluation system, etc.

2. Initiatives to enhance the effectiveness of governance

As basic governance activities, we continue to promote the development of forums for information sharing and exchange of opinions with Group companies and the creation of educational opportunities. In particular, in FYE March 2022 we increased the number of meetings of the Management Department Steering Committee, which mainly handles topics related to corporate functions, from once every fiscal year to once every two months, in order to expand communication and promptly address various issues. In addition, by converting our education for employees into a remote format, we have created an environment facilitating the necessary training even amid the COVID-19 pandemic. SUBARU also continues to dispatch its directors to Group companies and assigns standing corporate auditors appropriately.
Through these efforts, we are working to further improve the effectiveness of Group governance.

Initiatives in the SUBARU Group
  • Information sharing through a dedicated portal site for Group companies
  • Held meetings of Group company presidents (held three meetings)
  • Held meetings of the Management Department Steering Committee (held once every two months from FYE March 2022)
  • Held workshops for newly appointed executives (held one session)
  • Conducted rank-specific training for employees of Group companies (converted into remote format from FYE March 2022)
  • Dispatched personnel from the Business Administration Department of SUBARU to play a part in the management of Group companies by serving as part-time directors
  • Enhanced the quality of auditing through appropriate assignment of standing corporate auditors (12)

Dealerships

Initiatives designed for dealerships

  • The G10 Leadership Meeting
  • Meetings of the Internal Audit Department Liaison Committee (held twice a year)
  • Meetings of the General Affairs and IT Specialist Committees (held twice a year)
  • Enhanced the quality of auditing through appropriate assignment of standing corporate auditors (one standing corporate auditor, 11 part-time corporate auditors)
*
Parentheses indicate results from FYE March 2022

Cross-Shareholding

(1) Policy for cross-shareholding
SUBARU holds listed stocks as cross-shareholdings and engages in dialogues with the companies in question. Each year, SUBARU's Board of Directors quantitatively measures and compares benefits from holding, using dividend yield, and the capital cost involved, using weighted average cost of capital (WACC), in order to verify each. The Company will maintain these holdings only if it deems, based on the results of this verification, that the shares will contribute to its medium- to long-term management and business strategies in a qualitative manner.

(2) Verification details for cross-shareholding
Based on the above policy, SUBARU has steadily reduced the number of listed stocks held as cross-shareholding. As a result, 60 issues held at the end of March 2015 decreased to two issues at the end of March 2021. We consider these two issues to be essential to hold at this time for the following reasons, but we will continue to hold dialogue with these companies at least once a year, and the Board of Directors will evaluate and scrutinize these issues annually to determine whether they should be held or not.

Number of Listed Stocks and Total Amount Reported on the Balance Sheet

As of March 31, 2022

Issues Number of shares Amount reported on the balance sheet
(Millions of yen)
Purpose of holding, impact of holding,
and reason for increase in number of shares
The Gunma Bank, Ltd. 2,850,468 1,009 The Gunma Bank, a local bank of the area where the Company's main factory resides, is supporting not only SUBARU but also local supplier sites in Japan and abroad through its financial services. As the is an important partner, the Company will continue to hold the bank's shares to promote fair and smooth financial transactions.
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. 372,097 583 The Mizuho Financial Group firms have been supporting SUBARU with financial transactions and other services. In particular, the Mizuho Bank has long been the Company's most important financial partner, providing support in a broad area of management. The Company will continue to hold the group's shares to promote fair and smooth transactions.

(3) Criteria for exercising voting rights for cross-shareholding
With regard to the exercise of voting rights for listed stocks held as cross-shareholding, the Board of Directors deliberates on and determines the criteria for exercise with evaluation items such as whether the company is consistently exhibiting poor performance, whether a sufficient number of independent outside directors are in place and if management is supervised appropriately, and whether there are any corporate governance issues present. Although these are our general principles, we hold dialogues at least once a year with companies whose stock we hold to avoid making blanket decisions. Accordingly, we exercise our voting rights appropriately in light of the performance, management policies, and medium- to long-term management plans of the companies in question, as well as from the perspectives of corporate value enhancement, corporate governance, and social responsibility.
In addition, we will continue to verify whether or not our criteria for exercise of voting rights warrant review.